Salt, or Gravel?

Q: Does the culture in which you live find any significance of value in the death of Christ? That is, how important is Christ’s death for the people around you?

Beliefs about Christ and his death fall into several categories:

  1. Those who believe that Christ was not a real, historical person who
    lived and breathed in real history.
  2. Those who affirm that Christ was indeed a real, historical person who lived and breathed in real history.
    Of these who affirm Jesus Christ’s existence, they can be further subdivided into two categories:
    1. Those who believe Christ was just a man.
    2. Those who believe Christ is the Son of God.

The latter of these final two categories could rightly be called “Christian” though perhaps we might subdivide it further.1 Even though there are many professing Christians, a vast majority of them, however do not live as though Jesus is the Son of God. Most of the general public in our culture, then, would fall into either the first category (1) or the second (2a) — whether in word or in deed. All this to say:

To most people, the death of Christ is just his death. Nothing more.

It holds no special meaning, gives no import, nor bears any weight. The deduction is that if Jesus was “just some religious figure,” then his life, and therefore his death, are “drops in the bucket” — merely one more human being to catalog in the annals of history, nothing more, nothing less.

Q: In what ways do you think we can promote the significance of the death of Christ in our own lives and that of those around us? That is, if the death of Christ is the climactic moment in human history, how can we live under that light and share that momentous event with others?

The most significant way that we can “promote” the significance of the death of Christ is by being obedient to him.

If Christ’s death is to mean anything at all, it must be that his blood washes us clean, not just from sin but to holiness. There is a decidedly skewed impression in our culture — both by the unsaved and within the church — that Christ saved us from sin solely because he loved us. “For God so loved the world…” as John 3:16 says. We like to quote that, and sometimes even let ourselves get as far as verse 17, but rarely do we make it down to verse 20:

[21] But he who practices the truth comes to the Light, so that his deeds may be manifested as having been wrought in God.”
John 3:20 (NAS)

In other words, our lives change, completely, when we come to God. We no longer walk in darkness. The “words of our mouths” and the “meditations of our heart” become “wrought of God.” Our lives should be examples of the abundant life that Christ died to give us.2 We are commanded to confess Christ before men,3 but we are also commanded to “be transformed” by our entire way of thinking being changed.4

Christs death is meaningless if it does not create real change in our lives.

And if it doesn’t we have genuine cause to doubt whether we really are confessing Christ as Lord of our lives. We are to live as slaves of Christ. A lord has complete control over his slaves; slaves, likewise, have no will of their own — they live in complete submission to the will of their lord. If our lives are not diametrically different from those in our culture, we have very good reason to question if we are saved.5 For the unsaved there are two responses to a Christ-centered, cross-centered, gospel-breathing life: Hate or Conversion.

Hate

[13] Do not be surprised, brethren, if the world hates you. [14] We know that we have passed out of death into life, because we love the brethren. He who does not love abides in death.
1 John 3:13 (NAS)

Conversion

[14] “You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden ; [15] nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house. [16] “Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven.”
Matthew 5:14-15 (NAS)

Our lives should be continuously burning lamps. Everything we do, everything we say, every choice we make, every thought we think should be held captive to the death of Christ, that we may not cheapen it, sure, but that we might cause him to be glorified by the sacrifice of our lives.6

We are either salt, or gravel.

Footnotes

  1. 1That is to say that, insofar as one “confesses with his mouth that Jesus Christ is Lord and believes in his heart that God raised him from the dead, he will be saved,” we might say that there are two additional groups: those that confess and those that don’t. For the sake of simplification of the argument alone, we will leave this out.
  2. 2John 10:10 (NAS) “10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy ; I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly.”
  3. 3Matthew 10:32-33 (NAS) “32 Therefore everyone who confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven. 33 But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven.”
  4. 4Romans 12:1-2 (NAS) “1 Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship. 2 And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect.”
  5. 51 John 2:4-6 (NAS) “4 The one who says, I have come to know Him, and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him; 5 but whoever keeps His word, in him the love of God has truly been perfected. By this we know that we are in Him: 6 the one who says he abides in Him ought himself to walk in the same manner as He walked.”
  6. 6Romans 12:1 (NAS) “1 Therefore I urge you, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies a living and holy sacrifice, acceptable to God, which is your spiritual service of worship.”
Posted in Web Log | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Stop Believing

This entry has been changed since its original posting. Non-grammatical changes have marked.

When speaking to non-believers, and even amongst those in the church, Evangelicals very often talk about or define their faith in terms of their beliefs. The dialog may go something like this:

Non-Believer: So you’re a Christian?
Christian: Yes!
Non-Believer: I think Christianity’s a total load of nonsense.
Christian: Well, I believe….

And off they go. You, too, may in fact do this yourself. I am going to attempt here to convince you that this is not simply ill-advised, but destructive — both to the un-believer and his perception of Christianity, and to you as well. Here is why.

From a purely human perspective, the term “belief” connotes a personal understanding of a either a given truth or possibility. The either/or in that statement is crucial. Let’s take a look a some of the things we typically “believe” as examples:

  1. “Will John arrive at 10?” “I believe so.”
  2. “I believe that is wrong.”
  3. “I believe that Mary can finish her project on time
  4. “Abortion goes against my beliefs.”
  5. “I believe in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth.”
  6. “I believe in you.”
  7. “I believe in Santa Clause.”

The context for each of these statements are gargantuan strides away from one another; some are vis-a-vis encouragement, others morality, others understanding, others faith, the list goes on. Let’s look again at the implications of those statements with respect to the word belief by replacing “belief” with other words, more precisely suited to what is meant by the speaker:

  1. “Will John arrive at 10?” “I hope so.”
  2. “I ? that is wrong.”
  3. “I have confidence that Mary can finish her project on time
  4. “Abortion goes against ?.”
  5. “I ? God the Father, Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth.”
  6. “I have confidence in you.”
  7. “I enjoy the myth of Santa Clause.”

You’ll notice that three statements have a question mark in lieu of a replacement word. That is because those statements, in marked contrast to the others, affect some statement about Biblical, absolute truth. The replacement words you choose depends on a person’s understanding of that truth. Is it emotional? Is it purely intellectual? Or is it a spiritual understanding that comes from God himself? Here is one perspective:

  1. “I think that is wrong.”
  2. “Abortion goes against my morals.”
  3. “I have faith in God the Father, Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth.”

These seem to be fairly innocuous statements, but they belie an uncertainty.1 And herein lies the consequence:

Using the word “belief” with respect to God’s truth implicitly allows for other options in place of that truth.

You may actually make statements using the term “belief” and mean something entirely different. Indeed, the true Christian, the authentic disciple of Christ would have no doubt in his mind about these statements because his God is profound clear in affirming each one of the truths that underly these of statements.

  1. “I know that is wrong.”
  2. “Abortion is evil.”
  3. “I affirm God the Father, Almighty, Maker of Heaven and Earth.”

Each of these statements is “airtight” by contrast to the originals. Knowing a truth, acknowledging an evil in explicit terms, and affirming a reality are all correspondingly unwavering in their stance and imply a truth with exists apart from anyone’s understanding or misunderstanding of it. This distinction relates directly to the conversation between believer and un-believer we started with. To put it succinctly:

Stop saying believe when you what you mean is know.

Let’s look at exceedingly lucid scripture on this topic, Hebrews 11:

[1] Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. [2] For by it the people of old received their commendation. [3] By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.
Hebrews 11:1-3 (ESV)

John Piper, in his sermon on Hebrews 11:1-3, made the following observations:

There is more here than meets the eye at first. The word for “assurance” in the first definition (“the assurance of things hoped for”) and the word for “conviction” in the second definition (“the conviction of things not seen”), are unusual words and very difficult to translate into English. You may remember the old King James Version: “Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.” These words “substance” and “evidence” are, in fact, very serious and important translations. What is the reality behind these two words and these two definitions of faith?
John Piper, What Faith Knows and Hopes For

For our purposes here, the distinction between “substance” and “assurance” as well as between “conviction” and “evidence” are the same as the distinction between “belief” and “knowledge.” If you are a Christian, you do not simply believe that Christ died for you, but know that He did. You may object, then, that the Bible makes numerous statements about “belief” — especially in Christ — and actually commands us to. In most of these cases, the Greek word that is translated “believe” is pisteuo, which is in most cases translated more accurately as “affirmed,” and in other cases, “know” or “knowledge.” Why? Again, affirmation and knowledge are simply acknowledgements of an existing reality. Belief, on the other hand, has the nefarious duality of both representing an affirmation and, arguably more recently, alternatives.

If you say “I believe Christ died for my sins,” what you mean is “I know Christ died for my sins,” or your faith is false. Faith in God represents an understanding of the realities of His truth that is so unequivocal that it may be considered the “proof” of things unseen. And while I understand that this may be very hard for some, it is a distinction with very practical implications, both for our evangelism and, by extension, for our theology.

Stop saying “believe” and I think you will see what a profound difference it makes in how you think about your faith — and how others do too.

Footnotes

1 It should be noted that the term “faith” is an admittedly loaded one — far moreso than even “belief” — and may likewise be more or less tenuous in its implications, depending on how it is defined. Faith is a word that should never be used outside of Christian circles without explicit definition, in context — especially outside of Christian circles.

Additional Resources

Posted in Web Log | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Discovering Vivian Maier

A friend of mine shared this compelling story of a street photographer who worked in nearly complete isolation her entire life and was only discovered recently. Her work seems to me to be of the same caliber and bent as Eisenstaedt and Bresson, but with a refreshing spontaneity.

The Discovery of Vivian Maier


Vivian Maier – Chicago Tonight Video, December 22, 2010

Jay Shefsky tells the amazing story of Vivian Maier, a Chicago nanny who took more than 100,000 photos during her lifetime but never showed them to anyone. Now that she’s gone and her photos have been discovered, some say she may rank among the top street photographers of the 20th century.
Chicago Tonight

Vivian Maier Photographs

Additional Resources

Posted in Web Log | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

R.C. Sproul Discusses the Issue of Abortion

Audio (MP3):

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

R.C. Sproul & R.C. Sproul, Jr. discuss the topic of abortion—its place in the culture, in the church, and where it has come since the landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973. They discuss Christian ethics, what they believe the church should do about abortion, and how they feel the church can make an impact to protect unborn children. Dr. Sproul’s book, Abortion: A Rational Look at an Emotional Issue is being re-released 20 years after the original edition.
Ligonier Ministries

Thoughts to Consider

“What that usually reveals to me, when somebody says, ‘I have a right to my own body’ — the tacit assumption is, ‘I have a right to do whatever I want.’ The undercurrent of that is a crass kind of moral relativism, where ‘Whatever I prefer is my moral right to do.’”
R.C. Sproul

“I think people have been almost brainwashed to believe that it’s OK. Even in the churches, people take their cue as what’s right and what’s legitimate from what is legal. And if the government says it’s OK, and you’re not going to get arrested, you pay your money, you get your problem solved, and you don’t give [it] another thought. But if indeed we are determinately killing and destroying living human persons, that means that we have the most volatile ethical, social, moral issue in the history of the United States of America.”
R.C. Sproul

“The majority of people on this question say: ‘I wouldn’t choose abortion, but I think it’s up to the individual to make that choice.’ That is the ultimate cop-out. It’s like the Senate and the House getting together and saying, “Well, we don’t think it’s a good idea for cars to drive 90 miles an hour on the highway — everywhere in towns, and everything — but we’re going to leave that matter up to the individual, because we don’t want to over-govern them.”
R.C. Sproul

“The single most important task of any government is the protect and the maintenance and the support of human life. And if there’s any place where our government has abdicated its responsibility under God to protect its people, it’s with respect to the unborn child.”
R.C. Sproul

“This is not just evil. This is a monstrous evil.”
R.C. Sproul

“I’ve spent my whole life studying and teaching theology, and I can tell you, if I know anything at all about God, I know that God hates abortion. And I know that He will not tolerate this forever.”
R.C. Sproul

Additional Resources

Posted in Web Log | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment